Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 8 authors, 2020-10-26

Re: [PATCH 07/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add extra sram control

From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-26 15:16:44
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

Hi Matthias,

On 10/9/20 20:27, Matthias Brugger wrote:

On 10/09/2020 19:28, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
quoted
From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>

For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to do clock
and internal isolation while power on/off sram. We add a cap
"MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO" to judge if we need to do the extra sram isolation
control or not.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <redacted>
---

  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index 3aa430a60602..0802eccc3a0b 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
    #define MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP        BIT(0)
  #define MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM        BIT(1)
+#define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO        BIT(2)
  #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x)    ((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x))
    #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON            0x0210
@@ -42,6 +43,8 @@
  #define PWR_ON_BIT            BIT(2)
  #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT            BIT(3)
  #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT            BIT(4)
+#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT        BIT(5)
+#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT        BIT(6)
    #define PWR_STATUS_DISP            BIT(3)
  #define PWR_STATUS_MFG            BIT(4)
@@ -162,6 +165,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd,
void __iomem *ctl_addr)
      if (ret < 0)
          return ret;
  +    if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO))    {
+        val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+        writel(val, ctl_addr);
+        udelay(1);
+        val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+        writel(val, ctl_addr);
+    }
+
      return 0;
  }
  @@ -171,8 +182,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain
*pd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
      u32 val;
      int tmp;
  -    val = readl(ctl_addr);
-    val |= pd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+    if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO))    {
+        val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+        writel(val, ctl_addr);
+        val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+        writel(val, ctl_addr);
+        udelay(1);
+    }
+
+    val = readl(ctl_addr) | pd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
Nit, I'd prefer:
val = readl(ctl_addr);
val |= pd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
done in next version.
quoted
      writel(val, ctl_addr);
        /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help