On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:06:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

From: Ahmed S. Darwish <redacted>

The usage of in_interrupt() in drivers is phased out for various reasons.

Various comments use !in_interrupt() to describe calling context for probe()
and remove() functions. That's wrong because the calling context has to be
preemptible task context, which is not what !in_interrupt() describes.

Cleanup the comments. While at it add the missing kernel doc argument
descriptors.

Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
---
V2: Split out the static change and add a missing comment
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c     |    9 ++++-----
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-pmcmsp.c  |   11 +++++++----
 drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c    |   11 ++++++++---
 drivers/usb/host/ohci-omap.c    |    9 ++++++---
 drivers/usb/host/ohci-pxa27x.c  |   11 ++++++-----
 drivers/usb/host/ohci-s3c2410.c |   12 ++++++------
 6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel