Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: aardvark: Fix comphy with old ATF
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-02 15:03:22
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:52:37PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 02 October 2020 15:38:51 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:quoted
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:26:16PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:quoted
On Friday 02 October 2020 14:37:13 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:quoted
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 04:43:42PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:quoted
This patch series fixes regression introduced in commit 366697018c9a ("PCI: aardvark: Add PHY support") which caused aardvark driver initialization failure on EspressoBin board with factory version of Arm Trusted Firmware provided by Marvell. Second patch depends on the first patch, so please add appropriate Fixes/Cc:stable@ tags to have both patches correctly backported to stable kernels. I have tested both patches with Marvell ATF firmware ebin-17.10-uart.zip and with upstream ATF+uboot and aardvark was initialized successfully. Without this patch series on ebin-17.10-uart.zip aardvark initialization failed. Pali Rohár (2): phy: marvell: comphy: Convert internal SMCC firmware return codes to errno PCI: aardvark: Fix initialization with old Marvell's Arm Trusted Firmware drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 4 +++- drivers/phy/marvell/phy-mvebu-a3700-comphy.c | 14 +++++++++++--- drivers/phy/marvell/phy-mvebu-cp110-comphy.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)Applied to pci/aardvark (both patches), thanks.Ok! For second patch would be needed to put CC:stable line with specifying prerequisite of first patch as written in document: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html If I understood it correctly, second patch needs following line: Cc: <redacted> # <commit_id_of_first_path>: comphy: errno return codes where <commit_id_of_first_path> is commit id of PATCH 1/2. (correct me if I'm wrong) Now when first commit has commit id, could you update second commit to include this information about prerequisite?No I can't because they will be merged at the same time.And it is a problem? Git commit id of first patch would not be changed, so referencing to it is now possible from second commit (unless you do rebasing).quoted
What we can do is mark the second patch for stableThis is done by adding "Cc: [off-list ref]" line to second patch which I suggested, right?
I will apply the stable tag and dependency, it should be fine. Please ensure you follow up stable updates especially in case patches don't backport properly (ie please try). Lorenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel