Re: [PATCH v3 30/39] arm64: kasan: Enable TBI EL1
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Date: 2020-09-25 11:44:34
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Date: 2020-09-25 11:44:34
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 9/25/20 12:37 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:37AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S index 12ba98bc3b3f..dce06e553c7c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S@@ -40,9 +40,13 @@ #define TCR_CACHE_FLAGS TCR_IRGN_WBWA | TCR_ORGN_WBWA #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS -#define TCR_KASAN_FLAGS TCR_TBI1 +#define TCR_KASAN_SW_FLAGS TCR_TBI1 #else -#define TCR_KASAN_FLAGS 0 +#define TCR_KASAN_SW_FLAGS 0 +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS +#define TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS TCR_TBI1 #endif /*@@ -454,6 +458,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup) /* set the TCR_EL1 bits */ orr mte_tcr, mte_tcr, #SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA1 +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS + orr mte_tcr, mte_tcr, #TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS +#endifI missed this in an earlier patch. Do we need TCMA1 set without KASAN_HW? If not, we could add them both to TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS.
We don't. I will move the code around in the next version. -- Regards, Vincenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel