Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2020-09-01 17:13:34
Also in:
kexec, linux-doc, lkml
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2020-09-01 17:13:34
Also in:
kexec, linux-doc, lkml
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 03:07:04PM +0800, chenzhou wrote:
On 2020/8/10 14:03, Dave Young wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
Previously I remember we talked about to use similar logic as X86, but I remember you mentioned on some arm64 platform there could be no low memory at all. Is this not a problem now for the fallback? Just be curious, thanks for the update, for the common part looks good.Did you mean this discuss: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/122?I meant about this reply instead :) https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/16/616Sorry for not repley in time, I was on holiday last week. The platform James mentioned may exist for which have no devices and need no low memory.
If there is no memory below 4GB, the arm64 kernel assumes that the 32-bit devices will have some DMA offsets shifting the addresses to the bottom of the available RAM. So even if RAM starts above 4GB, we ZONE_DMA32 will be allocated in the bottom 4GB of the high memory (and if the hardware designers forgot to shift those DMA accesses, we don't have to support the platform ;)). So the arm64 notion of low memory differs slightly from the x86 one. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel