On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 03:36:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Chen Zhou [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
In preparation for supporting reserve_crashkernel_low in arm64 as
x86_64 does, move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kernel/crash_core.c.
BTW, move x86_64 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M suggested by Dave. CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN
can be selected from 2M to 16M, move to the same as arm64.
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <redacted>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 24 ++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 86 +++---------------------------------
include/linux/crash_core.h | 3 ++
include/linux/kexec.h | 2 -
kernel/crash_core.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/kexec_core.c | 17 -------
6 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
Since the changes are centered around arm64, I suppose the arm64 tree
will carry this patchset?
Assuming that this is a 100% invariant moving of code that doesn't
regress on x86:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar [off-list ref]
Thanks Ingo. The only difference I see is that CRASH_ALIGN has been
reduced to 2M here from 16M for x86. Would this break configs that have
PHYSICAL_ALIGN > 2M?
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel