Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 6 authors, 2020-08-07

Re: [PATCH v7 09/25] coresight: etm3x: allow etm3x to be built as a module

From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: 2020-08-05 14:55:32

On 08/05/2020 01:54 PM, Mike Leach wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 12:05, Suzuki K Poulose [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 08/05/2020 03:54 AM, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
quoted
From: Kim Phillips <redacted>

Allow to build coresight-etm3x as a module, for ease of development.

- Kconfig becomes a tristate, to allow =m
- append -core to source file name to allow module to
    be called coresight-etm3x by the Makefile
- add an etm_remove function, for module unload
- add a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for autoloading on boot

Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <redacted>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tingwei Zhang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <redacted>
quoted
quoted
       bool "CoreSight Embedded Trace Macrocell 4.x driver"
       depends on ARM64
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
index 19497d1d92bf..d619cfd0abd8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SINK_TPIU) += coresight-tpiu.o
   obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SINK_ETBV10) += coresight-etb10.o
   obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_LINKS_AND_SINKS) += coresight-funnel.o \
                                          coresight-replicator.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM3X) += coresight-etm3x.o coresight-etm-cp14.o \
+obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM3X) += coresight-etm3x.o
+coresight-etm3x-y := coresight-etm3x-core.o coresight-etm-cp14.o \
                                       coresight-etm3x-sysfs.o
   obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X) += coresight-etm4x.o \
                                       coresight-etm4x-sysfs.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c
similarity index 97%
rename from drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
rename to drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c
index bf22dcfd3327..82b333c40006 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c
@@ -895,6 +895,23 @@ static int etm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
       return ret;
   }

+static int __exit etm_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
+{
+     struct etm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&adev->dev);
+
+     etm_perf_symlink(drvdata->csdev, false);
+
+     if (--etm_count == 0) {
Could there be multiple instances of remove running in parallel ? I
believe we need some sort of a protection here to avoid racing.

Or even better, I would recommend leaving the notifiers registered
at module_init and removed at the cleanup of the module, just like
we are doing for etm4x driver, and get rid of this silly scheme.
I would agree that this needs addressing but this is an independent
problem that could be better served by a separate patchset, rather
I agree that it is an independent problem, but this series makes it more
exposed, i.e, calling the probe/remove at runtime in any order.
So, pushing this series before that is fixed is going to cause trouble,
if they both end up in different releases.
than add feature creep to this set. The same schema is used in the CTI
driver as well and needs fixing there.
quoted
Like here :

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200729051310.18436-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org
This conflicts with the init / exit fns created for module loading in
the etm4x part of this set..

A decision needs to be made on which set gets applied first - my view
is that the module set could go first, then a set fixing the PM
registration issues for all three affected drivers to be applied next.
I think we should do the opposite. Fixing the hotplug is fairly straight
forward, and need not block on this large series.

Cheers
Suzuki

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help