On 08/02/20 at 07:36pm, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport <redacted>
for_each_memblock() is used to iterate over memblock.memory in
a few places that use data from memblock_region rather than the memory
ranges.
Introduce separate for_each_mem_region() and for_each_reserved_mem_region()
to improve encapsulation of memblock internals from its users.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <redacted>
---
.clang-format | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/netlogic/xlp/setup.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
include/linux/memblock.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
mm/memblock.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++----
8 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 9e51b3fd4134..a6970e058bd7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -522,9 +522,22 @@ static inline unsigned long memblock_region_reserved_end_pfn(const struct memblo
return PFN_UP(reg->base + reg->size);
}
-#define for_each_memblock(memblock_type, region) \
- for (region = memblock.memblock_type.regions; \
- region < (memblock.memblock_type.regions + memblock.memblock_type.cnt); \
+/**
+ * for_each_mem_region - itereate over registered memory regions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wonder why emphasize 'registered' memory.
Other than this confusion to me, this patch looks good.
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <redacted>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel