Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2020-08-05

Re: Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arm: dts: mt7623: add display subsystem related device nodes

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-08-05 08:36:48
Also in: dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 09:27 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
or should we split dtsi to have a common part (mt7623.dtsi), and one for
soc (mt7623n.dtsi/mt7623a.dtsi)?

mt7623.dtsi => mt7623n.dtsi => mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
mt7623.dtsi => mt7623a.dtsi => mt7623a-unielec-u7623.dts (not existing yet,
openwrt seems to use a board-specific dtsi)
Yes, I think we should.

I'll create mt7623a.dtsi and upstream the U7623 support; I think that
can happen without conflicting with anything you do.

I note that the GPU node has been added to mt7623.dtsi in 5.8 too;
that'll want to move to the new mt7623n.dtsi that you create, along
with your other new additions.

Does that seem reasonable?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help