On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 09:27 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:

or should we split dtsi to have a common part (mt7623.dtsi), and one for
soc (mt7623n.dtsi/mt7623a.dtsi)?

mt7623.dtsi => mt7623n.dtsi => mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts
mt7623.dtsi => mt7623a.dtsi => mt7623a-unielec-u7623.dts (not existing yet,
openwrt seems to use a board-specific dtsi)

Yes, I think we should.

I'll create mt7623a.dtsi and upstream the U7623 support; I think that
can happen without conflicting with anything you do.

I note that the GPU node has been added to mt7623.dtsi in 5.8 too;
that'll want to move to the new mt7623n.dtsi that you create, along
with your other new additions.

Does that seem reasonable?