Re: [PATCH v5 06/27] clk: bcm: rpi: Use clk_hw_register for pllb_arm
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-06-25 00:42:48
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-06-15 01:40:46)
The pllb_arm clock is defined as a fixed factor clock with the pllb clock as a parent. However, all its configuration is entirely static, and thus we don't really need to call clk_hw_register_fixed_factor() but can simply call clk_hw_register() with a static clk_fixed_factor structure. Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <redacted> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <redacted> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <redacted> ---
Applied to clk-next _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel