Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 5 authors, 2020-06-11

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Exclude alloca() from the instrumentation logic

From: Alexander Popov <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-04 15:23:55
Also in: linux-kbuild, lkml

On 04.06.2020 17:01, Jann Horn wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:51 PM Alexander Popov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Some time ago Variable Length Arrays (VLA) were removed from the kernel.
The kernel is built with '-Wvla'. Let's exclude alloca() from the
instrumentation logic and make it simpler. The build-time assertion
against alloca() is added instead.
[...]
quoted
+                       /* Variable Length Arrays are forbidden in the kernel */
+                       gcc_assert(!is_alloca(stmt));
There is a patch series from Elena and Kees on the kernel-hardening
list that deliberately uses __builtin_alloca() in the syscall entry
path to randomize the stack pointer per-syscall - see
<https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/20200406231606.37619-4-keescook@chromium.org/ (local)>.
Thanks, Jann.

At first glance, leaving alloca() handling in stackleak instrumentation logic
would allow to integrate stackleak and this version of random_kstack_offset.

Kees, Elena, did you try random_kstack_offset with upstream stackleak?

It looks to me that without stackleak erasing random_kstack_offset can be
weaker. I mean, if next syscall has a bigger stack randomization gap, the data
on thread stack from the previous syscall is not overwritten and can be used. Am
I right?

Another aspect: CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS can be used for guessing kernel stack
offset, which is bad. It should be disabled if random_kstack_offset is on.

Best regards,
Alexander

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help