On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Alexander Popov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 04.06.2020 17:14, Jann Horn wrote:
quoted
Maybe at some point we should replace exclusions based on
GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS and KASAN_SANITIZE and UBSAN_SANITIZE and
OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD and so on with something more generic...
something that says "this file will not be built into the normal
kernel, it contains code that runs in realmode / userspace / some
similarly weird context, and none of our instrumentation
infrastructure is available there"...
Good idea. I would also add 'notrace' to that list.
Hm? notrace code should definitely still be subject to sanitizer
instrumentation.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel