Cc: Rob, devicetree ML

On 31.05.2020 01:57, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:33 AM Sylwester Nawrocki
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patch adds registration of a child platform device for the exynos
interconnect driver. It is assumed that the interconnect provider will
only be needed when #interconnect-cells property is present in the bus
DT node, hence the child device will be created only when such a property
is present.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>

Changes for v5:
 - new patch.
---
 drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index 8fa8eb5..856e37d 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@

 struct exynos_bus {
        struct device *dev;
+       struct platform_device *icc_pdev;

        struct devfreq *devfreq;
        struct devfreq_event_dev **edev;

@@ -156,6 +157,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
        if (ret < 0)
                dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");

+       platform_device_unregister(bus->icc_pdev);
+
        dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
        clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
        if (bus->opp_table) {

@@ -168,6 +171,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);

+       platform_device_unregister(bus->icc_pdev);
+
        dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
        clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
 }

@@ -431,6 +436,18 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        if (ret < 0)
                goto err;

+       /* Create child platform device for the interconnect provider */
+       if (of_get_property(dev->of_node, "#interconnect-cells", NULL)) {
+                   bus->icc_pdev = platform_device_register_data(
+                                               dev, "exynos-generic-icc",
+                                               PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, NULL, 0);
+
+                   if (IS_ERR(bus->icc_pdev)) {
+                           ret = PTR_ERR(bus->icc_pdev);
+                           goto err;
+                   }
+       }
+
        max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
        min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
        max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
--

2.7.4

It looks like very similar like the registering the interconnect
device of imx-bus.c
and I already reviewed and agreed this approach.

Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

nitpick: IMHO, I think that 'exynos-icc' is proper and simple without
'generic' word.
If we need to add new icc compatible int the future, we will add
'exynosXXXX-icc' new compatible.
But, I'm not forcing it. just opinion. Anyway, I agree this approach.

Thanks for review. I will change the name to exynos-icc in next version, 
as I commented at other patch, it is not part of any DT binding, 
it is just for device/driver matching between devfreq and interconnect.


--
Thanks, 
Sylwester

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel