Re: [PATCH 04/15] PCI: brcmstb: Add compatibily of other chips
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-20 11:51:33
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
Hi Jim, On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 16:34 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Jim Quinlan <redacted> Add in compatibility strings and code for three Broadcom STB chips. Some of the register locations, shifts, and masks are different for certain chips, requiring the use of different constants based on of_id. We would like to add the following at this time to the match list but we need to wait until the end of this patchset so that everything works. { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7211-pcie", .data = &generic_cfg }, { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7278-pcie", .data = &bcm7278_cfg }, { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-pcie", .data = &bcm7278_cfg }, { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-pcie", .data = &generic_cfg }, Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <redacted> --- drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.cb/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c index 73020b4ff090..c1cf4ea7d3d9 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c@@ -120,9 +120,8 @@ #define PCIE_EXT_SLOT_SHIFT 15 #define PCIE_EXT_FUNC_SHIFT 12 -#define PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1 0x9210 #define PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1_PERST_MASK 0x1 -#define PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_MASK 0x2 +#define PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1_PERST_SHIFT 0x0 /* PCIe parameters */ #define BRCM_NUM_PCIE_OUT_WINS 0x4@@ -152,6 +151,69 @@ #define SSC_STATUS_SSC_MASK 0x400 #define SSC_STATUS_PLL_LOCK_MASK 0x800 +#define IDX_ADDR(pcie) \ + (pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_INDEX]) +#define DATA_ADDR(pcie) \ + (pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_DATA]) +#define PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie) \ + (pcie->reg_offsets[RGR1_SW_INIT_1]) + +enum { + RGR1_SW_INIT_1, + EXT_CFG_INDEX, + EXT_CFG_DATA, +}; + +enum { + RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_MASK, + RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_SHIFT, +}; + +enum pcie_type { + GENERIC, + BCM7278, +}; + +struct pcie_cfg_data { + const int *reg_field_info; + const int *offsets; + const enum pcie_type type; +}; + +static const int pcie_reg_field_info[] = { + [RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_MASK] = 0x2, + [RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_SHIFT] = 0x1, +}; + +static const int pcie_reg_field_info_bcm7278[] = { + [RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_MASK] = 0x1, + [RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_SHIFT] = 0x0, +}; + +static const int pcie_offsets[] = { + [RGR1_SW_INIT_1] = 0x9210, + [EXT_CFG_INDEX] = 0x9000, + [EXT_CFG_DATA] = 0x9004, +}; + +static const struct pcie_cfg_data generic_cfg = { + .reg_field_info = pcie_reg_field_info, + .offsets = pcie_offsets, + .type = GENERIC, +}; + +static const int pcie_offset_bcm7278[] = { + [RGR1_SW_INIT_1] = 0xc010, + [EXT_CFG_INDEX] = 0x9000, + [EXT_CFG_DATA] = 0x9004, +}; + +static const struct pcie_cfg_data bcm7278_cfg = { + .reg_field_info = pcie_reg_field_info_bcm7278, + .offsets = pcie_offset_bcm7278, + .type = BCM7278, +};
It's not essential, but if v2 is due I'd suggest factoring out the bcm2728 specific structures above, and moving them to patch #15. This will keep a clearer division between the patch introducing the infrastructure and the one adding the support for a new device.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ struct brcm_msi { struct device *dev; void __iomem *base;@@ -176,6 +238,9 @@ struct brcm_pcie { int gen; u64 msi_target_addr; struct brcm_msi *msi; + const int *reg_offsets; + const int *reg_field_info; + enum pcie_type type; }; /*@@ -602,20 +667,21 @@ static struct pci_ops brcm_pcie_ops = { static inline void brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32val) { - u32 tmp; + u32 tmp, mask = pcie->reg_field_info[RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_MASK]; + u32 shift = pcie->reg_field_info[RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_SHIFT];
I don't think you need shift here, IIUC u32p_replace_bits() will take care of all the masking and shifting internally, moreover, you'd be able to drop the shift entry from reg_field_info.
- tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1); - u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, val, PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_MASK); - writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1); + tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie)); + tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask); + writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie)); }
Regards, Nicolas