Thread (42 messages) flat view 42 messages, 4 authors, 2020-05-08

Re: [PATCH V3 02/16] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-05-04 20:25:05
Also in: lkml

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed to guests. Hence lets
drop it.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 6d032fbe416f..51386dade423 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr1[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
Hmm, this still confuses me. Is this not now FTR_NONSTRICT? Why is that ok?

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help