Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL feature
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-03-25 16:42:20
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-03-25 16:42:20
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:15:58PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
Hi Zhenyu, On 3/24/20 1:45 PM, Zhenyu Ye wrote:quoted
In order to reduce the cost of TLB invalidation, the ARMv8.4 TTL feature allows TLBs to be issued with a level allowing for quicker invalidation. This series provide support for this feature. Patch 1 and Patch 2 was provided by Marc on his NV series[1] patches, which detect the TTL feature and add __tlbi_level interface.How does this interact with THP? (I don't see anything on that in the series.) With THP, there is no one answer to the size of mapping in a VMA. This is a problem because the arm-arm has in "Translation table level hints" in D5.10.2 of DDI0487E.a: | If an incorrect value for the entry being invalidated by the | instruction is specified in the TTL field, then no entries are | required by the architecture to be invalidated from the TLB. If we get it wrong, not TLB maintenance occurs! Unless THP leaves its fingerprints on the vma, I think you can only do this for VMA types that THP can't mess with. (see transparent_hugepage_enabled())
The convention way to deal with that is to issue the TBLI for all possible sizes. Power9 has all this, please look there. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel