Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL feature
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-03-25 13:32:39
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-03-25 13:32:39
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:49:45PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
Hi Peter, On 2020/3/24 23:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:45:28PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:quoted
In order to reduce the cost of TLB invalidation, the ARMv8.4 TTL feature allows TLBs to be issued with a level allowing for quicker invalidation. This series provide support for this feature. Patch 1 and Patch 2 was provided by Marc on his NV series[1] patches, which detect the TTL feature and add __tlbi_level interface.I realy hate how it makes vma->vm_flags more important for tlbi.Thanks for your review. The tlbi interfaces only have two parameters: vma and addr. If we try to not use vma->vm_flags, we may should have to add a parameter to some of these interfaces(such as flush_tlb_range), which are common to all architectures. I'm not sure if this is feasible, because this feature is only supported by ARM64 currently.
Power (p9-radix) also has level dependent invalidation instructions, so at the very least you can hook them up as well. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel