Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 5 authors, 2020-03-26

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL feature

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-03-25 13:32:39
Also in: linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:49:45PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
Hi Peter,

On 2020/3/24 23:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:45:28PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
quoted
In order to reduce the cost of TLB invalidation, the ARMv8.4 TTL
feature allows TLBs to be issued with a level allowing for quicker
invalidation.  This series provide support for this feature. 

Patch 1 and Patch 2 was provided by Marc on his NV series[1] patches,
which detect the TTL feature and add __tlbi_level interface.
I realy hate how it makes vma->vm_flags more important for tlbi.
Thanks for your review.

The tlbi interfaces only have two parameters: vma and addr. If we
try to not use vma->vm_flags, we may should have to add a parameter
to some of these interfaces(such as flush_tlb_range), which are
common to all architectures.

I'm not sure if this is feasible, because this feature is only
supported by ARM64 currently.
Power (p9-radix) also has level dependent invalidation instructions, so
at the very least you can hook them up as well.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help