Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: x86: Move init-only kvm_x86_ops to separate struct
From: Sean Christopherson <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-23 15:29:13
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-mips, lkml
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 01:10:40PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] writes:quoted
+ + .runtime_ops = &svm_x86_ops, +};Unrelated to your patch but I think we can make the naming of some of these functions more consistend on SVM/VMX, in particular I'd suggest has_svm() -> cpu_has_svm_support() is_disabled -> svm_disabled_by_bios() ... (see below for VMX)quoted
+ static int __init svm_init(void) { - return kvm_init(&svm_x86_ops, sizeof(struct vcpu_svm), + return kvm_init(&svm_init_ops, sizeof(struct vcpu_svm), __alignof__(struct vcpu_svm), THIS_MODULE); }diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index 07299a957d4a..ffcdcc86f5b7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c@@ -7842,11 +7842,8 @@ static bool vmx_check_apicv_inhibit_reasons(ulong bit) } static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = { - .cpu_has_kvm_support = cpu_has_kvm_support, - .disabled_by_bios = vmx_disabled_by_bios, - .hardware_setup = hardware_setup, .hardware_unsetup = hardware_unsetup, - .check_processor_compatibility = vmx_check_processor_compat, + .hardware_enable = hardware_enable, .hardware_disable = hardware_disable, .cpu_has_accelerated_tpr = report_flexpriority,@@ -7981,6 +7978,15 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = { .apic_init_signal_blocked = vmx_apic_init_signal_blocked, }; +static struct kvm_x86_init_ops vmx_init_ops __initdata = { + .cpu_has_kvm_support = cpu_has_kvm_support, + .disabled_by_bios = vmx_disabled_by_bios, + .check_processor_compatibility = vmx_check_processor_compat, + .hardware_setup = hardware_setup,cpu_has_kvm_support() -> cpu_has_vmx_support() hardware_setup() -> vmx_hardware_setup()
Preaching to the choir on this one. The VMX functions without prefixes in
in particular annoy me to no end, e.g. hardware_setup(). Though the worst
is probably ".vcpu_create = vmx_create_vcpu", if I had a nickel for every
time I've tried to find vmx_vcpu_create()...
What if we added a macro to auto-generate the common/required hooks? E.g.:
static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
MANDATORY_KVM_X86_OPS(vmx),
.pmu_ops = &intel_pmu_ops,
...
};
That'd enforce consistent naming, and would provide a bit of documentation
as to which hooks are optional, e.g. many of the nested hooks, and which
must be defined for KVM to function.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel