We don't want to expose complicated features to guests until we have
a good grasp on the basic CPU emulation. So let's pretend that RAS,
doesn't exist in a nested guest. We already hide the feature bits,
let's now make sure VDISR_EL1 will UNDEF.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 966eb31a84e6..364020afc17c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -592,6 +592,14 @@ static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return read_zero(vcpu, p);
}
+static bool trap_undef(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* ARMv8.1 mandates at least a trivial LORegion implementation, where all the
* RW registers are RES0 (which we can implement as RAZ/WI). On an ARMv8.0@@ -2056,6 +2064,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VBAR_EL2, 0 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RVBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, RVBAR_EL2, 0 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RMR_EL2), access_wi, reset_val, RMR_EL2, 1 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_VDISR_EL2), trap_undef },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL2, 0 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TPIDR_EL2, 0 },--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel