Re: [PATCH v5 12/19] KVM: Move memslot deletion to helper function
From: Sean Christopherson <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-07 18:07:23
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-mips, lkml
From: Sean Christopherson <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-07 18:07:23
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-mips, lkml
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:59:12AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:quoted
/* * Make a full copy of the old memslot, the pointer will become stale * when the memslots are re-sorted by update_memslots() in * kvm_delete_memslot(), while to make the kvm_free_memslot() work as * expected later on, we still need the cached memory slot. */As above, it's more subtle than just the kvm_delete_memslot() case. /* * Make a full copy of the old memslot, the pointer will become stale * when the memslots are re-sorted by update_memslots() when deleting * or moving a memslot, and additional modifications to the old memslot * need to be made after calling update_memslots(). */
Actually, that's not quite correct, as the same is true for all memslot
updates, and we still query @old after update_memslots() for CREATE and
FLAGS. This is better.
/*
* Make a full copy of the old memslot, the pointer will become stale
* when the memslots are re-sorted by update_memslots(), and the old
* memslot needs to be referenced after calling update_memslots(), e.g.
* to free its resources and for arch specific behavior.
*/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel