Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2020-02-14

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Add support for controlling Lucid PLLs

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-02-05 19:33:55
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml

Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2020-01-24 14:32:24)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
index 1b073b2..4258ab0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
@@ -1367,3 +1388,172 @@ static int clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
        .set_rate = clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_set_rate,
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_ops);
+
+void clk_lucid_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap,
Can we get some kernel documentation for this function?
+                            const struct alpha_pll_config *config)
+{
+       if (config->l)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), config->l);
+
+       regmap_write(regmap, PLL_CAL_L_VAL(pll), LUCID_PLL_CAL_VAL);
+
+       if (config->alpha)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), config->alpha);
+
+       if (config->config_ctl_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_CONFIG_CTL(pll),
+                            config->config_ctl_val);
+
+       if (config->config_ctl_hi_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U(pll),
+                            config->config_ctl_hi_val);
+
+       if (config->config_ctl_hi1_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U1(pll),
+                            config->config_ctl_hi1_val);
+
+       if (config->user_ctl_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll),
+                            config->user_ctl_val);
+
+       if (config->user_ctl_hi_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL_U(pll),
+                            config->user_ctl_hi_val);
+
+       if (config->user_ctl_hi1_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL_U1(pll),
+                            config->user_ctl_hi1_val);
+
+       if (config->test_ctl_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL(pll),
+                            config->test_ctl_val);
+
+       if (config->test_ctl_hi_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL_U(pll),
+                            config->test_ctl_hi_val);
+
+       if (config->test_ctl_hi1_val)
+               regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL_U1(pll),
+                            config->test_ctl_hi1_val);
+
+       regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_UPDATE_BYPASS,
+                          PLL_UPDATE_BYPASS);
+
+       /* Disable PLL output */
+       regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),  PLL_OUTCTRL, 0);
+
+       /* Set operation mode to OFF */
+       regmap_write(regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll), PLL_STANDBY);
+
+       /* PLL should be in OFF mode before continuing */
+       wmb();
How does the write above overtake the write below? This barrier looks
wrong.
+
+       /* Place the PLL in STANDBY mode */
+       regmap_update_bits(regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_RESET_N, PLL_RESET_N);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_lucid_pll_configure);
+
+/*
+ * The Lucid PLL requires a power-on self-calibration which happens when the
+ * PLL comes out of reset. Calibrate in case it is not completed.
+ */
+static int alpha_pll_lucid_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+       struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
+       u32 regval;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* Return early if calibration is not needed. */
+       regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_STATUS(pll), &regval);
+       if (regval & LUCID_PCAL_DONE)
+               return 0;
+
+       ret = clk_trion_pll_enable(hw);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       clk_trion_pll_disable(hw);
+
+       return 0;
Can you write this like:

	/* On/off to calibrate */
	ret = clk_trion_pll_enable(hw);
	if (!ret)
		clk_trion_pll_disable(hw);

	return ret;
+}
+
+static int alpha_pll_lucid_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+                                   unsigned long prate)
+{
+       struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
+       unsigned long rrate;
+       u32 regval, l, alpha_width = pll_alpha_width(pll);
+       u64 a;
+       int ret;
+
+       rrate = alpha_pll_round_rate(rate, prate, &l, &a, alpha_width);
+
+       /*
+        * Due to a limited number of bits for fractional rate programming, the
+        * rounded up rate could be marginally higher than the requested rate.
+        */
+       if (rrate > (rate + PLL_RATE_MARGIN) || rrate < rate) {
Any chance this can be pushed into the alpha_pll_round_rate() API? It's
duplicated in this driver.
+               pr_err("Call set rate on the PLL with rounded rates!\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
+       regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), a);
+
+       /* Latch the PLL input */
+       ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),
+                                PLL_UPDATE, PLL_UPDATE);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       /* Wait for 2 reference cycles before checking the ACK bit. */
Are reference cycles 2 * 1 / 19.2MHz?
+       udelay(1);
+       regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), &regval);
+       if (!(regval & ALPHA_PLL_ACK_LATCH)) {
+               WARN(1, "PLL latch failed. Output may be unstable!\n");
Do we need a big WARN stack for this? How about pr_warn() instead?
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       /* Return the latch input to 0 */
+       ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),
+                                PLL_UPDATE, 0);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       if (clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) {
+               ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       /* Wait for PLL output to stabilize */
+       udelay(100);
+       return 0;
+}
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help