On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Second-level context descriptor tables will be allocated lazily in
arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(). Help with handling allocation failure by
moving the CD write into arm_smmu_domain_finalise_s1().
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e147087198ef..b825a5639afc 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2301,8 +2301,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise_s1(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
cfg->cd.ttbr = pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr[0];
cfg->cd.tcr = pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr;
cfg->cd.mair = pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.mair;
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(smmu_domain, 0, &cfg->cd);
Hmm. This ends up calling arm_smmu_sync_cd() but I think that happens before
we've added the master to the devices list of the domain. Does that mean we
miss the new SSID during the invalidation?
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free_tables;
+
return 0;
+out_free_tables:
nit: We have more tables in this driver than you can shake a stick at, so
please rename the label "out_free_cd_tables" or something like that.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel