Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add context descriptor tables allocators
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-01-14 11:07:00
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-pci
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 05:30:26PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Support for SSID will require allocating context descriptor tables. Move the context descriptor allocation to separate functions. Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted> --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index b287e303b1d7..43d6a7ded6e4 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c@@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_cd_table { struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg { struct arm_smmu_cd_table table; struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc cd; + u8 s1cdmax; }; struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg {@@ -1455,6 +1456,31 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) } /* Context descriptor manipulation functions */ +static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, + struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table, + size_t num_entries) +{ + size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3); + + table->ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &table->ptr_dma, + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!table->ptr) { + dev_warn(smmu->dev, + "failed to allocate context descriptor table\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + return 0; +} + +static void arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, + struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table, + size_t num_entries) +{ + size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3); + + dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, table->ptr, table->ptr_dma); +}
I think we'd be better off taking the 'arm_smmu_s1_cfg' as a parameter here instead of the table pointer and a num_entries value, since the code above implies that we support partial freeing of the context descriptors. I can do that as a follow-up patch if you agree. Thoughts? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel