Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/11] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation.
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-17 09:50:54
Also in:
linux-mips, linuxppc-dev, lkml
Le 17/01/2020 à 09:58, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
Hi! On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 05:58:24PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
On a powerpc8xx, with current powerpc/32 ASM VDSO: gettimeofday: vdso: 907 nsec/call clock-getres-realtime: vdso: 484 nsec/call clock-gettime-realtime: vdso: 899 nsec/call The first patch adds VDSO generic C support without any changes to common code. Performance is as follows: gettimeofday: vdso: 1211 nsec/call clock-getres-realtime: vdso: 722 nsec/call clock-gettime-realtime: vdso: 1216 nsec/call Then a few changes in the common code have allowed performance improvement. At the end of the series we have: gettimeofday: vdso: 974 nsec/call clock-getres-realtime: vdso: 545 nsec/call clock-gettime-realtime: vdso: 941 nsec/call The final result is rather close to pure ASM VDSO: * 7% more on gettimeofday (9 cycles) * 5% more on clock-gettime-realtime (6 cycles) * 12% more on clock-getres-realtime (8 cycles)Nice! Much better. It should be tested on more representative hardware, too, but this looks promising alright :-)
Yes. Now the challenge is to get VDSO32 buildable on PPC64. The big issue is that in most powerpc/include/asm/*.h , CONFIG_PPC64 is used to know if the build is a 64 bits build or a 32 bits build, so VDSO32 build fails. I don't know how this could be easily fixed. Christophe _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel