Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 4 authors, 2020-01-15

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/20] net: dsa: add GRO support

From: Alexander Lobakin <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-13 09:30:25
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml, netdev

Vladimir Oltean wrote 31.12.2019 18:32:
Hi Alexander,
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 16:31, Alexander Lobakin [off-list ref] 
wrote:
quoted
I mark this as RFC, and there are the key questions for maintainers,
developers, users etc.:
- Do we need GRO support for DSA at all?
- Which tagger protocols really need it and which don't?
- Does this series bring any performance improvements on the
  affected systems?
If these are these questions for maintainers, developers, users etc,
then what has determined you to make these changes?
The main reason was obviously pretty good results on a particular
hardware on which I developed this (and other) series and a general
opinion that GRO improves overall performance on most systems.
DSA is a special case though.
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Regards,
ᚷ ᛖ ᚢ ᚦ ᚠ ᚱ

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help