Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 2 authors, 2019-12-19

Re: [PATCH v9 6/9] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

From: Nicolas Boichat <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-16 07:29:12
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:47 PM Weiyi Lu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to
do clock and internal isolation while power on/off sram.
We add a flag "sram_iso_ctrl" in scp_domain_data to judge if we
need to do the extra sram isolation control or not.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <redacted>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 2bbf907..0676b46 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
 #define PWR_ON_BIT                     BIT(2)
 #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT                 BIT(3)
 #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT                        BIT(4)
+#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT            BIT(5)
+#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT          BIT(6)

 #define PWR_STATUS_CONN                        BIT(1)
 #define PWR_STATUS_DISP                        BIT(3)
@@ -115,6 +117,8 @@ enum clk_id {
  * @name: The domain name.
  * @sta_mask: The mask for power on/off status bit.
  * @ctl_offs: The offset for main power control register.
+ * @sram_iso_ctrl: The flag to judge if the power domain need to do
+ *                 the extra sram isolation control.
  * @sram_pdn_bits: The mask for sram power control bits.
  * @sram_pdn_ack_bits: The mask for sram power control acked bits.
  * @bus_prot_mask: The mask for single step bus protection.
@@ -130,6 +134,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
        const char *name;
        u32 sta_mask;
        int ctl_offs;
+       bool sram_iso_ctrl;
        u32 sram_pdn_bits;
        u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits;
        u32 bus_prot_mask;
@@ -269,6 +274,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
                        return ret;
        }

+       if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl)  {
+               val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+               writel(val, ctl_addr);
+               udelay(1);
+               val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+               writel(val, ctl_addr);
+       }
+
        return 0;
 }
@@ -278,8 +291,16 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
        u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
        int tmp;

-       val = readl(ctl_addr);
-       val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+       if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl)  {
+               val = readl(ctl_addr);
+               val |= PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
You do this in 1 line above. I don't really care, but be consistent?
e.g. val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+               writel(val, ctl_addr);
+               val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+               writel(val, ctl_addr);
+               udelay(1);
+       }
+
+       val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
        writel(val, ctl_addr);

        /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
--
1.8.1.1.dirty
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help