Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 2 authors, 2019-12-19

Re: [PATCH v9 4/9] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control

From: Nicolas Boichat <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-16 07:22:10
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:47 PM Weiyi Lu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Both MT8183 & MT6765 have more control steps of bus protection
than previous project. And there add more bus protection registers
reside at infracfg & smi-common. Also add new APIs for multiple
step bus protection control with more customized arguments.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <redacted>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile           |  2 +-
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c   | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c       | 39 +++++++++----
 include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h | 39 +++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
index b017330..b442be9 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ) += mtk-cmdq-helper.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o mtk-scpsys-ext.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP) += mtk-pmic-wrap.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS) += mtk-scpsys.o
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4f1adda
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
+ * Author: Owen Chen <Owen.Chen@mediatek.com>
+ */
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h>
+
+#define MTK_POLL_DELAY_US   10
+#define MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT    USEC_PER_SEC
+
+static int set_bus_protection(struct regmap *map, u32 mask, u32 ack_mask,
+               u32 reg_set, u32 reg_sta, u32 reg_en)
+{
+       u32 val;
+
+       if (reg_set)
+               regmap_write(map, reg_set, mask);
+       else
+               regmap_update_bits(map, reg_en, mask, mask);
At least for 8183, we never seen to use the reg_set case, can we
simplify this function?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+       return regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, reg_sta,
+                       val, (val & ack_mask) == ack_mask,
+                       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
From 8183, I see that you have either:
 1. mask == ack_mask
 2. ack_mask == 0 (essentially this skips this test)

Would it be simpler to just skip this test if reg_sta == 0, and always
assume mask == ack_mask otherwise?

e.g.
if (reg_sta == 0)
   return 0;

return regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, reg_sta,
                       val, (val & mask) == mask,
                       MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
[snip]
+
+int mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table,
+       struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common)
+{
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < MAX_STEPS; i++) {
+               struct regmap *map = NULL;
+               int ret;
+
+               if (bp_table[i].type == INVALID_TYPE)
+                       continue;
break? (but yes the one below in mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection
has to be continue).
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+               else if (bp_table[i].type == IFR_TYPE)
+                       map = infracfg;
+               else if (bp_table[i].type == SMI_TYPE)
+                       map = smi_common;
+
+               ret = set_bus_protection(map,
+                               bp_table[i].mask, bp_table[i].mask,
+                               bp_table[i].set_ofs, bp_table[i].sta_ofs,
+                               bp_table[i].en_ofs);
+
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+int mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table,
+       struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common)
+{
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = MAX_STEPS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+               struct regmap *map = NULL;
+               int ret;
+
+               if (bp_table[i].type == INVALID_TYPE)
+                       continue;
+               else if (bp_table[i].type == IFR_TYPE)
+                       map = infracfg;
+               else if (bp_table[i].type == SMI_TYPE)
+                       map = smi_common;
+
+               ret = clear_bus_protection(map,
+                               bp_table[i].mask, bp_table[i].clr_ack_mask,
+                               bp_table[i].clr_ofs, bp_table[i].sta_ofs,
+                               bp_table[i].en_ofs);
+
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 915d635..466bb749 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
+#include <linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h>

 #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2701-power.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2712-power.h>
@@ -120,6 +121,7 @@ enum clk_id {
  * @basic_clk_id: provide the same purpose with field "clk_id"
  *                by declaring basic clock prefix name rather than clk_id.
  * @caps: The flag for active wake-up action.
+ * @bp_table: The mask table for multiple step bus protection.
  */
 struct scp_domain_data {
        const char *name;
@@ -131,6 +133,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
        enum clk_id clk_id[MAX_CLKS];
        const char *basic_clk_id[MAX_CLKS];
        u8 caps;
+       struct bus_prot bp_table[MAX_STEPS];
As with the previous patch, I'm not a big fan of having 2 approaches
for something similar (bus_prot_mask vs bp_table), can we define a
simple macro for this?
e.g.:
.bp_table = BUS_PROT_SINGLE(mask)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help