Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2020-01-08

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] pwm: mxs: avoid a division in mxs_pwm_apply()

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-04 14:08:43
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-pwm, lkml

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
Since the divisor is not a compile-time constant (unless gcc somehow
decided to unroll the loop PERIOD_CDIV_MAX times), this does a
somewhat expensive 32/32 division. Replace that with a right shift.

We still have a 64/32 division just below, but at least in that
case the divisor is compile-time constant.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c
index 57562221c439..f2e57fcf8f8b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
 #define  PERIOD_CDIV(div)	(((div) & 0x7) << 20)
 #define  PERIOD_CDIV_MAX	8
 
-static const unsigned int cdiv[PERIOD_CDIV_MAX] = {
-	1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 64, 256, 1024
+static const u8 cdiv_shift[PERIOD_CDIV_MAX] = {
+	0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10
One small nitpick: I would like to see this name have a mxs_pwm_ prefix.
But even without this change:

Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help