Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: add binding doc for the ARM SMC/HVC mailbox
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-30 09:32:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-30 09:32:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:52:40AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:37 AM Peng Fan [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
If I get your point correctly, On UP, both could not be active. On SMP, tx/rx could be both active, anyway this depends on secure firmware and Linux firmware design. Do you have any suggestions about arm,func-ids here?I was thinking if this is just an instruction, why can't each channel be represented as a controller, i.e, have exactly one func-id per controller node. Define as many controllers as you need channels ?
I might have missed to follow this, but what's the advantage of doing so ? Which can't single controller instance deal with all the channels ? -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel