Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: add binding doc for the ARM SMC/HVC mailbox
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-30 09:30:14
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-30 09:30:14
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:37:41AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Jassi,quoted
quoted
I think there could be channel for TEE, and channel for Linux. For virtualization case, there could be dedicated channel for each VM.I am talking from Linux pov. Functions 0xfe and 0xff above, can't both be active at the same time, right?If I get your point correctly, On UP, both could not be active. On SMP, tx/rx could be both active, anyway this depends on secure firmware and Linux firmware design.
Just to confirm, we can't have SMC/HVC based Rx channel as there's no *architectural* way to achieve it. So it can be based on some interrupt from secure side and hence will be a *different* type of channel/controller. Sorry to make this point repeatedly, but juts to be absolutely clear: as it stands, SMC/HVC can be used only for Tx today. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel