Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
From: Alex Kogan <hidden>
Date: 2019-07-17 14:53:17
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:39:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
quoted
My primary concern was readability; I find the above suggestion much more readable. Maybe it can be written differently; you'll have to play around a bit.static void cna_splice_tail(struct cna_node *cn, struct cna_node *head, struct cna_node *tail) { struct cna_node *list; /* remove [head,tail] */ WRITE_ONCE(cn->mcs.next, tail->mcs.next); tail->mcs.next = NULL; /* stick [head,tail] on the secondary list tail */ if (cn->mcs.locked <= 1) { /* create secondary list */ head->tail = tail; cn->mcs.locked = head->encoded_tail; } else { /* add to tail */ list = (struct cna_node *)decode_tail(cn->mcs.locked); list->tail->next = head; list->tail = tail; } } static struct cna_node *cna_find_next(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { struct cna_node *cni, *cn = (struct cna_node *)node; struct cna_node *head, *tail = NULL; /* find any next lock from 'our' node */ for (head = cni = (struct cna_node *)READ_ONCE(cn->mcs.next); cni && cni->node != cn->node; tail = cni, cni = (struct cna_node *)READ_ONCE(cni->mcs.next)) ;I think we can do away with those READ_ONCE()s, at this point those pointers should be stable. But please double check.
I think we can get rid of WRITE_ONCE above and the first READ_ONCE, as the “first” next pointer (in the node of the current lock holder) is stable at this point, and is not read / written concurrently. We do need the second READ_ONCE as we traverse the list and can come across a next pointer being changed. — Alex
quoted
/* when found, splice any skipped locks onto the secondary list */ if (cni && tail) cna_splice_tail(cn, head, tail); return cni; } How's that?
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel