Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2019-07-16 11:05:41
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2019-07-16 11:05:41
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote:
+/** + * find_successor - Scan the main waiting queue looking for the first + * thread running on the same node as the lock holder. If found (call it + * thread T), move all threads in the main queue between the lock holder + * and T to the end of the secondary queue and return T; otherwise, return NULL. + */ +static struct cna_node *find_successor(struct mcs_spinlock *me)
Either don't use a kernel doc comment, but if you must, you have to stick to their format, otherwise we'll get endless stupid patches fixing up the stupid comment. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel