Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 8 authors, 2019-07-05

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2019-07-04 21:29:00
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:53:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 19:59:38 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:53:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:35:51 -0700 Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Let me know and I can help orchestate this.
Well.  Whatever works.  In this situation I'd stage the patches after
linux-next and would merge them up after the prereq patches have been
merged into mainline.  Easy.
All right, what the hell just happened? 
Christoph's patch series for the devmap & hmm rework finally made it
into linux-next
We're talking about "dev_pagemap related cleanups v4", yes?

I note that linux-next contains "mm: remove the HMM config option"
which was present in Christoph's v3 series but wasn't present in v4. 
Perhaps something has gone wrong here.
When CH sent v4 to the list it was corrupted, v3 is the one to
reference for content.

Here is the mailing thread discussing this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190702184201.GO31718@mellanox.com/ (local)
quoted
sorry, it took quite a few iterations on the list to
get all the reviews and tests, and figure out how to resolve some
other conflicting things. So it just made it this week.

Recall, this is the patch series I asked you about routing a few weeks
ago, as it really exceeded the small area that hmm.git was supposed to
cover. I think we are both caught off guard how big the conflict is!
I guess I was distracted - I should have taken a look to see how
mergable it all was.
Okay, fair enough. I also could have also done more checks myself with
linux-next
It's a large patchset and it appears to be mainly (entirely?) code
cleanups.  I don't think such material would be appropriate for a late
-rc7 merge even if it didn't conflict with lots of other higher
priority pending functional changes and fixes!
I see your other email you resolved the conflicts - so please let me
know if you want to proceed with dropping CH's series or not, I'll
make a special effort to get that change into tomorrows linux-next if
you want (it is already 6pm here)

Regards,
Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help