Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2019-06-26 15:38:33
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:35:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
Robin, Andrew:As a heads-up, Robin is currently on holiday, so this is all down to Andrew's preference.quoted
I have a series for the hmm tree, which touches the section size bits, and remove device public memory support. It might be best if we include this series in the hmm tree as well to avoid conflicts. Is it ok to include the rebase version of at least the cleanup part (which looks like it is not required for the actual arm64 support) in the hmm tree to avoid conflicts?Per the cover letter, the arm64 patch has a build dependency on the others, so that might require a stable brnach for the common prefix.
I guess we'll just have to live with the merge errors then, as the mm tree is a patch series and thus can't easily use a stable base tree. That is unlike Andrew wants to pull in the hmm tree as a prep patch for the series. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel