On Wed 03 Jul 2019 at 13:45, Neil Armstrong [off-list ref] wrote:
On 03/07/2019 01:16, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
quoted
+Cc Alexandre Mergnat
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:13 AM Neil Armstrong [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add a setup() callback in the eeclk structure, to call an optional
call() function at end of eeclk probe to setup clocks.
It's used for the G12A clock controller to setup the CPU clock notifiers.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <redacted>
this will probably work fine, but I want do double check first
are we planning to get rid of meson-eeclk (mid-term)?
AFAIK no, but maybe I'm not aware of it !
Neil
quoted
Alex has some patches to get rid of all these IN_PREFIX logic.
The prefix logic will go away with Alex's rework, so are the input clock
But meson-eeclk, which is just a common probe function do avoid
repeating the same things over and over, will stay
quoted
I'm asking because if we want to get rid of meson-eeclk it may be the
May I ask why ?
quoted
time to do so now to have less logic to migrate later on
Martin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel