Thread (57 messages) 57 messages, 3 authors, 2019-07-11

Re: [PATCH v4.4 20/45] mm: Introduce lm_alias

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2019-06-18 05:00:15
Also in: stable

On 17-06-19, 13:33, Julien Thierry wrote:
I think this commit was backported in 4.9 because one of the commits you
dropped (6840bdd73d07 arm64: KVM: Use per-CPU vector when BP hardening
is enabled) depended on it.
Looks like that. I dropped 6840bdd73d07 patch at a later point of time when the
conflicts couldn't get resolved properly any further. I should have dropped
$subject one as well :(
I have yet to check whether that other
commit can be just dropped, however on your branch 4.4 branch, lm_alias
isn't used anywhere, so we probably don't want to backport this
particular patch (unless we need to actually backport the other patch in
some way).
Right, dropping this doesn't generate any compilation warnings so we should be
good without it.

-- 
viresh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help