[PATCH v4.4 36/45] arm/arm64: KVM: Turn kvm_psci_version into a static inline
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2019-06-14 03:13:30
Also in:
stable
Subsystem:
arm port, kernel virtual machine for arm64 (kvm/arm64), the rest · Maintainers:
Russell King, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Linus Torvalds
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> commit a4097b351118e821841941a79ec77d3ce3f1c5d9 upstream. We're about to need kvm_psci_version in HYP too. So let's turn it into a static inline, and pass the kvm structure as a second parameter (so that HYP can do a kern_hyp_va on it). Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <redacted> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [ v4.4: account for files moved to virt/ upstream and drop switch.c changes ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 12 ++---------- include/kvm/arm_psci.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
index 76821adf4fde..9abf40734723 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu) if (!vcpu) return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS; if (!vcpu->arch.power_off) { - if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1) + if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu, kvm) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1) return PSCI_RET_ALREADY_ON; else return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
@@ -230,14 +230,6 @@ static void kvm_psci_system_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kvm_prepare_system_event(vcpu, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET); } -int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) - return KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST; - - return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1; -} - static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
@@ -395,7 +387,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ static int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu)) { + switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu, vcpu->kvm)) { case KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0: return kvm_psci_1_0_call(vcpu); case KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2:
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
index ed1dd8088f1c..e518e4e3dfb5 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_psci.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_psci.h@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #ifndef __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ #define __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ +#include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <uapi/linux/psci.h> #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1 PSCI_VERSION(0, 1)
@@ -26,7 +27,25 @@ #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST KVM_ARM_PSCI_1_0 -int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +/* + * We need the KVM pointer independently from the vcpu as we can call + * this from HYP, and need to apply kern_hyp_va on it... + */ +static inline int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm) +{ + /* + * Our PSCI implementation stays the same across versions from + * v0.2 onward, only adding the few mandatory functions (such + * as FEATURES with 1.0) that are required by newer + * revisions. It is thus safe to return the latest. + */ + if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) + return KVM_ARM_PSCI_LATEST; + + return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1; +} + + int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); #endif /* __KVM_ARM_PSCI_H__ */
--
2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel