On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019 16:25:44 CEST Maxime Ripard wrote:

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 03:52:47PM +0200, luca@z3ntu.xyz wrote:

quoted

On May 21, 2019 3:09:55 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard 

[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0200, luca@z3ntu.xyz wrote:

quoted

On May 20, 2019 1:07:42 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard

[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:

quoted

Add a node describing the KEYADC on the A64.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <redacted>
---

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi

b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi

quoted

index 7734f70e1057..dc1bf8c1afb5 100644

--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi

@@ -704,6 +704,13 @@

 			status = "disabled";
 		
 		};

+		lradc: lradc@1c21800 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-

keys";

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+			reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 

IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+

The controller is pretty different on the A64 compared to the A10.

The

quoted

quoted

A10 has two channels for example, while the A64 has only one.

It looks like the one in the A83t though, so you can use that
compatible instead.

Looking at the patch for the A83t, the only difference is that it
uses a 3/4 instead of a 2/3 voltage divider, nothing is changed with
the channels.

I guess you can reuse the A83t compatible here then, and a more
specific a64 compatible in case we ever need to fix this.

quoted

But I'm also not sure which one (or a different one)
is used from looking at the "A64 User Manual".

I'm sorry, what are you referring to with "one" in that sentence?

Sorry, I meant I didn't find anything in the A64 user manual whether
a 3/4 or a 2/3 voltage divider (or one with different values) is
used on the A64.

Ok :)

I guess you can just reuse the A83t compatible then, together with the
A64's.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hi Maxime,
I'd submit a v2 with these changes to v1 then:
                lradc: lradc@1c21800 {
-                       compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-keys";
-                       reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
+                       compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-lradc-keys",
+                                    "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-lradc";
+                       reg = <0x01c21800 0x400>;
                        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
                        status = "disabled";
                };
Does that look okay?
The reg change is due to me not spotting the address being 0x01C2 
1800---0x01C2 1BFF, so the size should be 0x400 and not 0x100.

Thanks for the feedback,
Luca



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel