Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2019-06-04

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add lradc node

From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-21 13:10:01
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0200, luca@z3ntu.xyz wrote:
On May 20, 2019 1:07:42 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
quoted
Add a node describing the KEYADC on the A64.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
quoted
index 7734f70e1057..dc1bf8c1afb5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
@@ -704,6 +704,13 @@
 			status = "disabled";
 		};

+		lradc: lradc@1c21800 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-keys";
+			reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
The controller is pretty different on the A64 compared to the A10. The
A10 has two channels for example, while the A64 has only one.

It looks like the one in the A83t though, so you can use that
compatible instead.
Looking at the patch for the A83t, the only difference is that it
uses a 3/4 instead of a 2/3 voltage divider, nothing is changed with
the channels.
I guess you can reuse the A83t compatible here then, and a more
specific a64 compatible in case we ever need to fix this.
But I'm also not sure which one (or a different one)
is used from looking at the "A64 User Manual".
I'm sorry, what are you referring to with "one" in that sentence?

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help