On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:54 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:38 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add initial devicetree support for OrangePi 2G IoT board from Xunlong.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                    |  2 +
 .../boot/dts/rda8810pl-orangepi-2g-iot.dts    | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rda8810pl-orangepi-2g-iot.dts

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
index b0e966d625b9..a0fdad8f10dd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile

@@ -806,6 +806,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += \
        qcom-msm8974-sony-xperia-castor.dtb \
        qcom-msm8974-sony-xperia-honami.dtb \
        qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_RDA) += \
+       rda8810pl-orangepi-2g-iot.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALVIEW) += \

Question for Arnd/Olof: can we *please* start putting new SoC families
in sub-dirs?

I think we're at a point where it's becoming quite awkward to keep it
in a flat directory, yes.

Best way to handle this is usually right before the closing of a merge
window, so let's do it then. It'll be a conflict-ridden mess if we try
to stage something in -next, so I'd rather just do it directly in our
tree as a one-shot thing.


-Olof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel