On (11/27/18 18:33), Rafael David Tinoco wrote:

On 11/20/18 10:18 PM, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:

quoted

Russell,

I have tried to place MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS in the best available
header for each architecture, considering different paging levels, PAE
existence, and existing similar definitions. Also, I have only
considered those architectures already having "sparsemem.h" header.

Would you mind reviewing it ?

Should I re-send the this v2 (as v3) with complete list of
get_maintainer.pl ? I was in doubt because I'm touching headers from
several archs and I'm not sure who, if it is accepted, would merge it.

Yes, resending and Cc-ing archs' maintainers if the right thing to do.
It's also possible that they will ask to split the patch and do a
per-arch change.

	-ss