[PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: check encoded object value overflow for PAE
From: Rafael David Tinoco <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-25 11:04:25
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky [off-list ref] wrote:
On (10/24/18 22:27), Rafael David Tinoco wrote:quoted
static unsigned long location_to_obj(struct page *page, unsigned int obj_idx) { - unsigned long obj; + unsigned long obj, pfn; + + pfn = page_to_pfn(page); + + if (unlikely(OBJ_OVERFLOW(pfn))) + BUG();The trend these days is to have less BUG/BUG_ON-s in the kernel. -ss
For this case, IMHO, it is worth. It will avoid a investigation like: https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3765#c7 and and #c8, where I had to poison slab allocation - to force both zs_handle and zspage slabs not to be merged - and to make sure the zspage slab had a good magic number AND to identify why the bad paging request happened. If this happens again, for any other arch supporting PAE that does not declare MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS or MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS appropriately, the kernel will panic, no matter what, by the time it reaches obj_to_location(). Things can be more complicated about declarations for PAE if we consider ARM can declare MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS differently in arch/arm/mach-XXX and/or, for this case, when having, or not SPARSEMEM set (if I had SPARSEMEM set I would not face this, for example). If this occurs, the kernel will panic, no matter what, by the time it reaches obj_to_location()... so why not to BUG() here and let user to know exactly where it panic-ed and why ? Other option would be to WARN() here and let it panic naturally because of bad paging request in a very near future... please advise. Thanks, Best Rgds -Rafael