On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:30:55PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

+&i2c1 {
+       pinctrl-names = "default";
+       pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pins_a>;
+       status = "okay";
+
+       camera: camera at 21 {
+               compatible = "ovti,ov5640";
+               reg = <0x21>;
+                clocks = <&ccu CLK_CSI0>;
+                clock-names = "xclk";
+               assigned-clocks = <&ccu CLK_CSI0>;
+               assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
+
+                reset-gpios = <&pio 7 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+                powerdown-gpios = <&pio 7 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+                AVDD-supply = <&reg_cam_avdd>;
+                DOVDD-supply = <&reg_cam_dovdd>;
+                DVDD-supply = <&reg_cam_dvdd>;
+
+                port {
+                        ov5640_to_csi: endpoint {
+                                remote-endpoint = <&csi_from_ov5640>;
+                                bus-width = <8>;
+                                data-shift = <2>;
+                                hsync-active = <1>; /* Active high */
+                                vsync-active = <0>; /* Active low */
+                                data-active = <1>;  /* Active high */
+                                pclk-sample = <1>;  /* Rising */
+                        };
+                };
+       };

Does ov5640 need any further patches, wrt linux-next? I'm trying to
test this on top of linux-next but the slave id seems not detecting.

[    2.304711] ov5640 1-0021: Linked as a consumer to regulator.5
[    2.310639] ov5640 1-0021: Linked as a consumer to regulator.6
[    2.316592] ov5640 1-0021: Linked as a consumer to regulator.4
[    2.351540] ov5640 1-0021: ov5640_init_slave_id: failed with -6
[    2.357543] ov5640 1-0021: Dropping the link to regulator.5
[    2.363224] ov5640 1-0021: Dropping the link to regulator.6
[    2.368829] ov5640 1-0021: Dropping the link to regulator.4

Here is the full log [1], please let me know if I miss anything, I
even tried to remove MCLK pin

You seem to have made local modifications to your tree, what are they?
This indicates that the communication over i2c doesn't work, what is
your setup?

I just used your commits on linux-next [2], with the setup similar in
Page 5 on datasheet[3]. The only difference is csi build issue, I have
updated similar fix you mentioned on sun6i_csi [4]

[2] https://github.com/amarula/linux-amarula/commits/CSI-A20
[3] https://www.tme.eu/gb/Document/187887186b98a8f78b47da2774a34f4c/BPI-CAMERA.pdf
[4] https://github.com/amarula/linux-amarula/commit/a6762ecd38f000e2bd02dd255f6fd0c1ae755429#diff-0809a7f97ca58771c1cda186e73ec657

That branch doesn't have any commit with the same ID that you have in
your boot log.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20181127/b02a73d2/attachment.sig>