[PATCH v13 4/8] clk: qcom: Add CPU clock driver for msm8996
From: sboyd@kernel.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: 2018-10-17 15:38:45
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Quoting ilia.lin at gmail.com (2018-06-14 14:53:51)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 + drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h | 6 + drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c | 403 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 420 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.cdiff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig index 9c3480dcc38a..fe01df59f923 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig@@ -33,6 +33,16 @@ config QCOM_CLK_APCS_MSM8916 Say Y if you want to support CPU frequency scaling on devices such as msm8916. +config QCOM_CLK_APCC_MSM8996 + tristate "MSM8996 CPU Clock Controller" + depends on ARM64 + depends on COMMON_CLK_QCOM + select QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS + help + Support for the CPU clock controller on msm8996 devices. + Say Y if you want to support CPU clock scaling using CPUfreq + drivers for dyanmic power management.
APCC comes before APCS alphabetically, so move this up above the other config please.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ config QCOM_CLK_RPM tristate "RPM based Clock Controller" depends on COMMON_CLK_QCOM && MFD_QCOM_RPMdiff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile index 762c01137c2f..d142778f6e92 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_MMCC_8974) += mmcc-msm8974.o obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_MMCC_8996) += mmcc-msm8996.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_A53PLL) += a53-pll.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_APCS_MSM8916) += apcs-msm8916.o +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_APCC_MSM8996) += clk-cpu-8996.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_RPM) += clk-rpm.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_SMD_RPM) += clk-smd-rpm.o obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_GCC_845) += gcc-sdm845.odiff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h index f981b486c468..9ce2a32f30ab 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h@@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ struct pll_vco { u32 val; }; +#define VCO(a, b, c) { \ + .val = a,\ + .min_freq = b,\ + .max_freq = c,\ +} + /** * struct clk_alpha_pll - phase locked loop (PLL) * @offset: base address of registersdiff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d92cad93af20 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c@@ -0,0 +1,403 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + */ + +/* + * Each of the CPU clusters (Power and Perf) on msm8996 are + * clocked via 2 PLLs, a primary and alternate. There are also + * 2 Mux'es, a primary and secondary all connected together + * as shown below + * + * +-------+ + * XO | | + * +------------------>0 | + * | | + * PLL/2 | SMUX +----+ + * +------->1 | | + * | | | | + * | +-------+ | +-------+ + * | +---->0 | + * | | | + * +---------------+ | +----------->1 | CPU clk + * |Primary PLL +----+ PLL_EARLY | | +------> + * | +------+-----------+ +------>2 PMUX | + * +---------------+ | | | | + * | +------+ | +-->3 | + * +--^+ ACD +-----+ | +-------+ + * +---------------+ +------+ | + * |Alt PLL | | + * | +---------------------------+ + * +---------------+ PLL_EARLY + * + * The primary PLL is what drives the CPU clk, except for times + * when we are reprogramming the PLL itself (for rate changes) when + * we temporarily switch to an alternate PLL. A subsequent patch adds + * support to switch between primary and alternate PLL during rate + * changes. + * + * The primary PLL operates on a single VCO range, between 600MHz + * and 3GHz. However the CPUs do support OPPs with frequencies + * between 300MHz and 600MHz. In order to support running the CPUs + * at those frequencies we end up having to lock the PLL at twice + * the rate and drive the CPU clk via the PLL/2 output and SMUX. + * + * So for frequencies above 600MHz we follow the following path + * Primary PLL --> PLL_EARLY --> PMUX(1) --> CPU clk + * and for frequencies between 300MHz and 600MHz we follow + * Primary PLL --> PLL/2 --> SMUX(1) --> PMUX(0) --> CPU clk + * Support for this is added in a subsequent patch as well. + * + * ACD stands for Adaptive Clock Distribution and is used to + * detect voltage droops. + */ + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
include clk-provider.h?
+
+#include "clk-alpha-pll.h"
+#include "clk-regmap.h"
+
+enum _pmux_input {Is this enum used?
+ DIV_2_INDEX = 0,
+ PLL_INDEX,
+ ACD_INDEX,
+ ALT_INDEX,
+ NUM_OF_PMUX_INPUTS
+};
+
+static const u8 prim_pll_regs[PLL_OFF_MAX_REGS] = {
+ [PLL_OFF_L_VAL] = 0x04,
+ [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x08,
+ [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL] = 0x10,
+ [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL] = 0x18,
+ [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U] = 0x1c,
+ [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL] = 0x20,
+ [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x24,
+ [PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x28,
+};
+
+static const u8 alt_pll_regs[PLL_OFF_MAX_REGS] = {
+ [PLL_OFF_L_VAL] = 0x04,
+ [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x08,
+ [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL_U] = 0x0c,
+ [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL] = 0x10,
+ [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL_U] = 0x14,
+ [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL] = 0x18,
+ [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL] = 0x20,
+ [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x24,
+ [PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x28,
+};
+
+/* PLLs */
+
+static const struct alpha_pll_config hfpll_config = {
+ .l = 60,
+ .config_ctl_val = 0x200d4828,
+ .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x006,
+ .pre_div_mask = BIT(12),
+ .post_div_mask = 0x3 << 8,
+ .main_output_mask = BIT(0),
+ .early_output_mask = BIT(3),
+};
+
+static struct clk_alpha_pll perfcl_pll = {
+ .offset = 0x80000,
+ .regs = prim_pll_regs,
+ .flags = SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_UPDATE | SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
+ .name = "perfcl_pll",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
+ .num_parents = 1,
+ .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_huayra_ops,
+ },
+};
+
+static struct clk_alpha_pll pwrcl_pll = {
+ .offset = 0x0,
+ .regs = prim_pll_regs,
+ .flags = SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_UPDATE | SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
+ .name = "pwrcl_pll",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
+ .num_parents = 1,
+ .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_huayra_ops,
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct pll_vco alt_pll_vco_modes[] = {
+ VCO(3, 250000000, 500000000),
+ VCO(2, 500000000, 750000000),
+ VCO(1, 750000000, 1000000000),
+ VCO(0, 1000000000, 2150400000),
+};
+
+static const struct alpha_pll_config altpll_config = {
+ .l = 16,
+ .vco_val = 0x3 << 20,
+ .vco_mask = 0x3 << 20,
+ .config_ctl_val = 0x4001051b,
+ .post_div_mask = 0x3 << 8,
+ .post_div_val = 0x1,
+ .main_output_mask = BIT(0),
+ .early_output_mask = BIT(3),
+};
+
+static struct clk_alpha_pll perfcl_alt_pll = {
+ .offset = 0x80100,
+ .regs = alt_pll_regs,
+ .vco_table = alt_pll_vco_modes,
+ .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(alt_pll_vco_modes),
+ .flags = SUPPORTS_OFFLINE_REQ | SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+ .name = "perfcl_alt_pll",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
+ .num_parents = 1,
+ .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_hwfsm_ops,
+ },
+};
+
+static struct clk_alpha_pll pwrcl_alt_pll = {
+ .offset = 0x100,
+ .regs = alt_pll_regs,
+ .vco_table = alt_pll_vco_modes,
+ .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(alt_pll_vco_modes),
+ .flags = SUPPORTS_OFFLINE_REQ | SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+ .name = "pwrcl_alt_pll",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
+ .num_parents = 1,
+ .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_hwfsm_ops,
+ },
+};
+
+/* Mux'es */Nitpick: I have no idea why muxes is written as mux'es. Please drop the apostrophe.
+
+struct clk_cpu_8996_mux {
+ u32 reg;
+ u8 shift;
+ u8 width;
+ struct clk_hw *pll;
+ struct clk_regmap clkr;
+};
+
+static inline
+struct clk_cpu_8996_mux *to_clk_cpu_8996_mux_hw(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ return container_of(to_clk_regmap(hw), struct clk_cpu_8996_mux, clkr);
+}
+
+static u8 clk_cpu_8996_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ struct clk_regmap *clkr = to_clk_regmap(hw);
+ struct clk_cpu_8996_mux *cpuclk = to_clk_cpu_8996_mux_hw(hw);
+ u32 mask = (u32)GENMASK(cpuclk->width - 1, 0);
+
+ regmap_read(clkr->regmap, cpuclk->reg, &val);
+ val >>= (u32)(cpuclk->shift);
+
+ return (u8)(val & mask);Nitpick: What's with all the casts in here? Can they be removed?
+}
+
+static int clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
+{
+ u32 val;
+ struct clk_regmap *clkr = to_clk_regmap(hw);
+ struct clk_cpu_8996_mux *cpuclk = to_clk_cpu_8996_mux_hw(hw);
+ unsigned int mask = GENMASK(cpuclk->width + cpuclk->shift - 1,
+ cpuclk->shift);Maybe this can be a u32 so it fits on one line?
+ + val = (u32)index; + val <<= (u32)(cpuclk->shift); + + return regmap_update_bits(clkr->regmap, cpuclk->reg, mask, val);
Same comment about casting.
+}
+
+static int
+clk_cpu_8996_mux_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
+{
+ struct clk_cpu_8996_mux *cpuclk = to_clk_cpu_8996_mux_hw(hw);
+ struct clk_hw *parent = cpuclk->pll;
+
+ req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent, req->rate);
+ req->best_parent_hw = parent;
+
+ return 0;What's the necessity of this function? Is the parent not always cpuclk->pll?
+}
+
+const struct clk_ops clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops = {static?
+ .set_parent = clk_cpu_8996_mux_set_parent,
+ .get_parent = clk_cpu_8996_mux_get_parent,
+ .determine_rate = clk_cpu_8996_mux_determine_rate,
+};
+
+static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux pwrcl_smux = {
+ .reg = 0x40,
+ .shift = 2,
+ .width = 2,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+ .name = "pwrcl_smux",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){
+ "xo",
+ "pwrcl_pll_main",
+ },
+ .num_parents = 2,
+ .ops = &clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops,
+ .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+ },
+};
+
+static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux perfcl_smux = {
+ .reg = 0x80040,
+ .shift = 2,
+ .width = 2,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+ .name = "perfcl_smux",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){
+ "xo",
+ "perfcl_pll_main",
+ },
+ .num_parents = 2,
+ .ops = &clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops,
+ .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+ },
+};
+
+static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux pwrcl_pmux = {
+ .reg = 0x40,
+ .shift = 0,
+ .width = 2,
+ .pll = &pwrcl_pll.clkr.hw,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+ .name = "pwrcl_pmux",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){
+ "pwrcl_smux",
+ "pwrcl_pll",
+ "pwrcl_pll_acd",
+ "pwrcl_alt_pll",
+ },
+ .num_parents = 4,
+ .ops = &clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops,
+ .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,Please comment why CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED is used here.
+ },
+};
+
+static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux perfcl_pmux = {
+ .reg = 0x80040,
+ .shift = 0,
+ .width = 2,
+ .pll = &perfcl_pll.clkr.hw,
+ .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+ .name = "perfcl_pmux",
+ .parent_names = (const char *[]){
+ "perfcl_smux",
+ "perfcl_pll",
+ "perfcl_pll_acd",
+ "perfcl_alt_pll",
+ },
+ .num_parents = 4,
+ .ops = &clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops,
+ .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,Same. I guess it's because these clks should never be turned off?
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config cpu_msm8996_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 32,
+ .reg_stride = 4,
+ .val_bits = 32,
+ .max_register = 0x80210,
+ .fast_io = true,
+ .val_format_endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE,IS the endian thing needed? I don't think that has mattered before.
+};
+
+struct clk_regmap *clks[] = {Please name this something a little more cpu_clk_msm8996 specific.
+ &perfcl_pll.clkr,
+ &pwrcl_pll.clkr,
+ &perfcl_alt_pll.clkr,
+ &pwrcl_alt_pll.clkr,
+ &perfcl_smux.clkr,
+ &pwrcl_smux.clkr,
+ &perfcl_pmux.clkr,
+ &pwrcl_pmux.clkr,
+};
+
+static int
+qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_register_clks(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
+{
+ int i, ret;
+
+ perfcl_smux.pll = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "perfcl_pll_main",
+ "perfcl_pll",
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 1, 2);
+
+ pwrcl_smux.pll = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "pwrcl_pll_main",
+ "pwrcl_pll",
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 1, 2);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(clks); i++) {
+ ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, clks[i]);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ clk_alpha_pll_configure(&perfcl_pll, regmap, &hfpll_config);
+ clk_alpha_pll_configure(&pwrcl_pll, regmap, &hfpll_config);
+ clk_alpha_pll_configure(&perfcl_alt_pll, regmap, &altpll_config);
+ clk_alpha_pll_configure(&pwrcl_alt_pll, regmap, &altpll_config);
+
+ return ret;Slam this function into probe? I don't see the need to split it out.
+}
+
+static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct resource *res;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *data;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+ data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data) + 2 * sizeof(struct clk_hw *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &cpu_msm8996_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(regmap))
+ return PTR_ERR(regmap);
+
+ ret = qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_register_clks(dev, regmap);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ data->hws[0] = &pwrcl_pmux.clkr.hw;
+ data->hws[1] = &perfcl_pmux.clkr.hw;
+ data->num = 2;
+
+ return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, data);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_match_table[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-apcc" },
+ {}
+};Add a module device table macro?
+
+static struct platform_driver qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver = {
+ .probe = qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "qcom-msm8996-apcc",
+ .of_match_table = qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_match_table,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver);
+
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:msm8996-apcc");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM MSM8996 CPU Clock Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");