Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2018-10-17

[PATCH v13 3/8] clk: Use devm_ in the register fixed factor clock

From: sboyd@kernel.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: 2018-10-12 22:08:20
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml

Quoting Ricardo Salveti (2018-09-14 11:53:02)
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Ilia Lin <redacted>

Use devm_clk_hw_register instead of clk_hw_register
to simplify the usage of this API. This way drivers that call
the clk_hw_register_fixed_factor won't need to maintain
a data structure for further cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Ilia Lin <redacted>
Tested-by: Amit Kucheria <redacted>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
index a5d402de5584..8e39bda8e596 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct clk_hw *clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(struct device *dev,
        init.num_parents = 1;

        hw = &fix->hw;
-       ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
+       ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
Not sure what is the current state of this patch-set, but this change
breaks drivers calling clk_hw_register_fixed_factor with a NULL dev
(e.g. imx_clk_fixed_factor), as devm_clk_hw_register needs a valid dev
for devres_add to work.
Yep. Probably better to just have a driver register the clk_hw structure
itself with the clk framework vs. trying to get it right here in the
generic type registration function.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help