[PATCH] ARM: dts: Add support for Liebherr's BK4 device (vf610 based)
From: lukma@denx.de (Lukasz Majewski)
Date: 2018-09-24 08:31:03
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Fabio, Thanks for your review.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Lukasz Majewski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This commit adds DTS support for BK4 device from Liebherr. It uses vf610 SoC from NXP. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dts | 504 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 505 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dtsdiff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile index b5bd3de87c33..e6f159895fa9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile@@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A) += \ ls1021a-twr.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_VF610) += \ vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dtb \ + vf610-bk4.dtb \ vf610-colibri-eval-v3.dtb \ vf610m4-colibri.dtb \ vf610-cosmic.dtb \diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dtsb/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4ad7e739a0ad--- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dts@@ -0,0 +1,504 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) +/* + * Copyright 2018 + * Lukasz Majewski, DENX Software Engineering, lukma at denx.de + */ + +/dts-v1/; +#include "vf610.dtsi" + +/ { + model = "Liebherr BK4 controller"; + compatible = "lwn,bk4", "fsl,vf610"; + + chosen { + bootargs = "console=ttyLP1,115200";You could pass stdout-path instead.
Ok.
quoted
+ }; + + memory at 80000000 { + reg = <0x80000000 0x8000000>; + }; + + audio_ext: mclk_osc { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + #clock-cells = <0>; + clock-frequency = <24576000>; + };This seems to be unused.
The audio_ext label is used (referenced) in the "clks".
quoted
+ + enet_ext: eth_osc { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + #clock-cells = <0>; + clock-frequency = <50000000>; + }; + + leds { + compatible = "gpio-leds"; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpio_leds>; + + /* LED D5 */ + led0: heartbeat { + label = "heartbeat"; + gpios = <&gpio3 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + default-state = "on"; + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; + }; + }; + + regulators { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + reg_3p3v: regulator at 0 {Please move all regulators outside of the simple-bus container and use this naming convention: reg_3p3v: regulator-3p3v {
Ok.
quoted
+&dspi3 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_dspi3>; + bus-num = <3>; + status = "okay"; + + spidev3 at 0 { + compatible = "fsl,vf610-dspi"; + spi-max-frequency = <30000000>; + reg = <0>; + fsl,spi-slave-mode;Such property does not exist.
It has been added in the other patch sent to ML: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/18/792 But till now no comments/reply.
I also thought that spidev nodes in dt were not recommended.
This is a bit "unusual" on BK4, as the spidev driver is the only "user" of the SPI subsystem on this board. In other words - the /dev/spidevX.Y provided by spidev is solely used for communication. Hence, I would prefer to make it explicit in the DTS.
quoted
+&iomuxc {Like Stefan mentioned it is common practice on imx dts files to place the iomuxc node as the last one.
Ok.
quoted
+ pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_bk4_common>;This seems to be not called from any driver.
Yes. This is "base" setup for the board. Those configured pins are thereafter used by several user space programs.
We usually use a hog group for such purpose.
I wanted to name it explicit that we do use it for this controller. However, no problem to rename it to hog.
quoted
+ + pinctrl_bk4_common: commongrp { + fsl,pins = < + /* One_Wire_PSU_EN */ + VF610_PAD_PTC29__GPIO_102 0x1183 + /* SPI */ + VF610_PAD_PTB26__GPIO_96 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE14__GPIO_119 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE4__GPIO_109 0x1181 + /* Feedback_Lines */ + VF610_PAD_PTC31__GPIO_104 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTA7__GPIO_134 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTD9__GPIO_88 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE1__GPIO_106 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTB2__GPIO_24 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTB3__GPIO_25 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTB1__GPIO_23 0x1181 + /* SDHC */ + VF610_PAD_PTE19__GPIO_124 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTB23__GPIO_93 0x1181If they are related to SDHC they should be better placed under the sdhc nodes.
I will double check this.
quoted
+ /* GPI */ + VF610_PAD_PTE2__GPIO_107 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE3__GPIO_108 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE5__GPIO_110 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE6__GPIO_111 0x1181 + /* GPO */ + VF610_PAD_PTE0__GPIO_105 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE7__GPIO_112 0x1183 + /* RS485 */ + VF610_PAD_PTB8__GPIO_30 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTB9__GPIO_31 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE8__GPIO_113 0x1183 + /* MPBUS MPB_EN */ + VF610_PAD_PTE28__GPIO_133 0x1183 + /* LEDS */ + VF610_PAD_PTE15__GPIO_120 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTA12__GPIO_5 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTA16__GPIO_6 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE9__GPIO_114 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE20__GPIO_125 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE23__GPIO_128 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE16__GPIO_121 0x1183 + /* MISC */ + VF610_PAD_PTE10__GPIO_115 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE11__GPIO_116 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTE17__GPIO_122 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTC30__GPIO_103 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTB0__GPIO_22 0x1181 + /* RESETINFO */ + VF610_PAD_PTE26__GPIO_131 0x1183 + VF610_PAD_PTD6__GPIO_85 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE27__GPIO_132 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE13__GPIO_118 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE21__GPIO_126 0x1181 + VF610_PAD_PTE22__GPIO_127 0x1181 + /* EE_5V_EN */ + VF610_PAD_PTE18__GPIO_123 0x1183 + /* EE_5V_OC_N */ + VF610_PAD_PTE25__GPIO_130 0x1181Seems like a long list of pins without any driver associated.
Not kernel driver associated. The user space code uses those pins directly.
Please review such list carefully and assign to nodes that have a driver associated, such as rs485,LEDS, etc.
For example - the user space is not using in-kernel rs485 driver. But as said above - I will double check this.
quoted
+ +&usbphy0 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&usbphy1 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&qspi0 {This is not placed in alphabetical order.
Ok. Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180924/d5d13f8e/attachment.sig>