[RFC PATCH v2 09/12] gpiolib: Identify GPIO descriptor arrays with direct mapping
From: jmkrzyszt@gmail.com (Janusz Krzysztofik)
Date: 2018-08-07 17:19:02
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-gpio, linux-omap, lkml
On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 7:14:20 PM CEST Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 00:29:15 +0200 Janusz Krzysztofik [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Certain GPIO array lookup results may map directly to GPIO pins of a single GPIO chip in hardware order. If that condition is recognized and handled efficiently, significant performance gain of get/set array functions may be possible. While processing a request for an array of GPIO descriptors, verify if the descriptors just collected represent consecutive pins of a single GPIO chip. Pass that information with the array to the caller so it can benefit from enhanced performance as soon as bitmap based get/set array functions which can make efficient use of that are available. Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com> --- Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst | 4 +++- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst index aa03f389d41d..38a990b5f3b6 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst@@ -109,11 +109,13 @@ For a function using multiple GPIOs all of those can be obtained with one call:: enum gpiod_flags flags) This function returns a struct gpio_descs which contains an array of -descriptors:: +descriptors. It may also contain a valid descriptor of a single GPIO chip in +case the array strictly matches pin hardware layout of the chip:: struct gpio_descs { unsigned int ndescs; struct gpio_desc *desc[]; + struct gpio_chip *chip;chip is placed at the beginning of the struct in the real code, which is expected since putting it at the end won't work because of the desc[] declaration.
Yes, I've already noticed that and will fix on next iteration, thanks. Janusz