[PATCH 09/10] drm/vc4: Use __drm_atomic_helper_plane_reset instead of copying the logic
From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-24 12:54:21
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-samsung-soc
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 09:11:21AM +0100, Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe wrote:
Hi Maxime, On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:57:20AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:15:08PM +0100, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <redacted> --- drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c index 9d7a36f148cf..688ad9bb0f08 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c@@ -200,9 +200,7 @@ static void vc4_plane_reset(struct drm_plane *plane) if (!vc4_state) return; - plane->state = &vc4_state->base; - plane->state->alpha = DRM_BLEND_ALPHA_OPAQUE; - vc4_state->base.plane = plane; + __drm_atomic_helper_plane_reset(plane, &vc4_state->base);For vc4, rcar-du, atmel-hlcdc and sun4i, you're changing the reset value of alpha from DRM_BLEND_ALPHA_OPAQUE to plane->alpha_property->values[1].plane->alpha_property->values[1] holds the max value for alpha, and it's initialized by the core to DRM_BLEND_ALPHA_OPAQUE.quoted
This might or might not be a good idea, but you should definitely explain why.Would a commit message suffice? Or do you have other ideas?
Yes, that would be enough. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180724/2848509e/attachment-0001.sig>