Quoting Shawn Guo (2018-06-30 19:19:49)

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:39:38AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

Quoting Shawn Guo (2018-06-27 17:52:18)

quoted

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:14:39AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:

quoted

Gentle Ping...

I cannot apply this dts patch until the clock patch is landed on
mainline, because it has a dependency on new clock ID IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO1
created by clock patch.

Does it matter if that clk ID changes across branches? Or is everything
good if it just exists as some number?

We use macro IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO1 instead of hard-coded number in DTS.  So
it doesn't matter if IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO1 changes.

quoted

The patch adding the define
conflicts with another patch to fix the numbering scheme to be
incremental instead of changing IMX6UL and IMX6ULL which is annoying.
I'll probably make a topic branch just for the fix and merge it into
clk-fixes and this branch so you can pick it up from there if you like.

It will be good if you can have a topic branch.  Otherwise, we are also
fine to wait till the clock patches lands on mainline.

Ok. The topic branch is out there as clk-imx-gpio-gates