Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 8 authors, 2018-07-03
STALE2918d

[PATCH] arm64/acpi: Add fixup for HPE m400 quirks

From: geoff@infradead.org (Geoff Levand)
Date: 2018-06-15 18:15:34
Also in: linux-acpi

Hi Mark,

On 06/15/2018 10:33 AM, Mark Salter wrote:
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 10:17 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+            MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(read_cpuid_id()) == ARM_CPU_IMP_APM) {
How is the CPU implementer relevant?
That was just a copy of what other fixes had.  Should I remove it?
It was there because HPE ProLiant strings are generic and you may end up
disabling platforms which would otherwise work. It is the ProLiant system
based on the APM chipset which is the problem. Thus the check for cpu
implementor.
Your original fix that had this cpu implementor check was in the main
ACPI code, so would be built for other arches.  This is now in
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c, which will only be built for arm64.  Is that
enough to limit it, or do we still need the check?

-Geoff 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help